What role did Maurice Papon play in the World War II in french collective memory Free Essay Example, 1500 words

This was ranking as the second highest position in the whole of Gironde region (Golsan 149). Maurice Papon was already a strong leader and commander so he ordered the Vichy officials to be more alert in exterminating the Jews out of Paris. He first thought of putting all the children’s homes, children’s schools, convents and hostels under police observation. He also made sure was police was assigned everywhere where Jews might be hiding. Even though because of religious believes many saints and Catholic leaders complained but Maurice Papon justified it by telling them that because of the country’s defence this is important and at the time of the Vatican city, the pope did not speak so they should also let the work continue. Hence, Papon was successful in exterminating hundreds of Jews ‎ (Tigar 69). ‎. By the summer of 1942, Maurice Papon was successful in arresting about 1650 Jews which included men, women, senior citizens and even children. The prisoners were then sent to an Auschwitz, which is a house that was especially made by the German Nazi’s where the prisoners from different countries were held as captives. We will write a custom essay sample on What role did Maurice Papon play in the World War II in french collective memory or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now The house was first build to imprison the political leaders who were proved as a danger to the Nazi’s (Durham 180). Around twelve huge ships were arranged to take the Jewish prisoners to the Auschwitz. This process was done very fast because Maurice Papon feared that the Jews might escape the prison while this was happening. He got so dedicated to his work that out of the twelve huge ships, four were personally organized by him, which helped the transferring of the prisoners fast and secure and a handful of them were the only ones that could escape. Papon wanted to do least harm to the Jews because some of them were also the ones that were living in Paris for generations and some of them were very young and innocent children and some of them were senior citizens who were barely able to walk; this is why he made the decision of sending them of to the Auschwitz, where they will have the slightest bit of punishment or the punishment that all of them deserve. Even though this shows a very warm heart gesture, he is still not regarded for it (Tigar 69). By the mid of 1994, the tables started turning against Germany, which meant that the war was now against the Germans. Maurice Papon started to inform the German Nazi’s about the confrontation. It is usually quoted that Maurice Papon who took many Jewish men, women children and senior citizens as prisoners never let them reach a safe place like the Auschwitz and they were killed during the journey.

The Roman And Greek Civilization - 940 Words

It is truly fascinating how two different civilizations could fabricate almost every inch of society as long as humans can remember for thousands of years into the future and beyond. From the calendar and toilet to modern roads and concrete, both the Roman and Greek civilization terraformed the world and our homes. Both civilizations also introduced a wider variety of religion, mathematics, science, art and architecture concepts, machinery, military technology and strategy, astronomy, agriculture, philosophy, education, literature, politics, and much more that everyone cling onto throughout a day-to-day basis. To be open-minded, the Romans and Greeks technique invented the smartphone or perhaps the invention of the car thanks to the enhancements to technological improvements that has been handed down from the Romans and Greeks from generation to generation throughout the chains of time, in which gave modern scientist and researchers the inspiration and innovation to create such wonde rs of technology. That makes you wonder about a lot of things about the ancients! There are literally millions of topics in which could be covered between ancients and today civilization, but three of the main innovations the Greeks and Romans accomplished in influence among today’s society is government, architecture and art, and religion. Government: the political direction and control exercised over the actions of the members, citizens, or inhabitants of communities, societies, and states;Show MoreRelatedThe Greek And Roman Civilizations830 Words   |  4 Pages . The Greek and Roman Civilizations were quite similar in their Art, their Women’s Rights, and their Geographic location. The Greek believed their painted, sculpted and carved depictions of the people should be absolutely perfect. Especially the men. They found that the physical form was most pleasing to the eye and wanted to accentuate that beauty and deliver it through art. They sought out to present infinite elegance. Flawless statues and paintings showedRead MoreGreek and Roman civilizations1262 Words   |  6 Pagesthan the Greek and Roman empires. These empires began as small city-states, and grew to become the powerful empires we know today. The Greek and Roman empires were not always enemies, considering the Romans were greatly influenced by the Greek culture. The two civilizations shared many similarities, but had different opinions on government operations. There are three different periods that span the history of the Greek and Roman empires; the Hellenic, Hellenistic, and Roman civilization. I will thoroughlyRead MoreGreek And Roman Civilization Essay1010 Words   |  5 Pages HIST 1421: GREEK AND ROMAN CIVILIZATION What are the Economic and Political Differences Between the Patricians the Plebeian class ultimately led to Plebeian Revolt HIST 1421: Greek and Roman Civilization Written Assignment Unit 4 University of the People Term 5 (2016-2017) Introduction: The unit 4 written assignments asked about the Economic andRead MoreGreek And Roman Civilizations : Greece And Ancient Civilizations1498 Words   |  6 Pages Greek and Roman Civilizations In examining the impact that the ancient world has had on modern Western civilization, the two ancient civilizations which are frequently understood as having had the greatest influence are Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. These two civilizations would eventually come to shape much of what would become the modern European culture, politics and society, and by extension, a vast proportion of global culture and society. In examining the trajectory of modern historyRead MoreGreek And Roman Civilizations : Greece And Ancient Civilizations1503 Words   |  7 Pages Greek and Roman Civilizations In examining the impact that the ancient world has had on modern Western civilization, the two ancient civilizations which are frequently understood as having had the greatest influence are Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. These two civilizations would eventually come to shape much of what would become the modern European culture, politics and society, and by extension, a vast proportion of global culture and society. In scrutinizing the trajectory of modern historyRead MoreROMANS HEIRS TO GREEK AND HELLENISTIC CIVILIZATION2107 Words   |  9 Pagesï » ¿ IN WHAT WAYS WERE THE ROMANS HEIRS TO GREEK AND HELLENISTIC CIVILIZATION? The Hellenistic civilization marked an important time in Greek culture. This was the period between 323 and 31 BC, at one point the Greek society changed from being withdrawn and localized to an aggressive multinational, unprotected, and eager culture that infused together southwest Asia and eastern Mediterranean. The Hellenistic world involved many different people but the Greeks’ thinking and way of lifeRead MoreA Short Note On Greek And Roman Civilization882 Words   |  4 PagesHIST 1421: GREEK AND ROMAN CIVILIZATION UNIT 5: Punic Wars: Roman Revolution Written Assignment University of the People Question: Trace how Carthage became almost the equal of Rome. Be sure to show the strength of both and how this conflict led to Rome becoming a naval power. Introduction The history of the Ancient empires, there were various wars and rivalries that existed between Carthage and Rome (Morey, 1901). These two nations were well-known for war, power and strength situated at the westernRead More Greek And Roman Influence On Western Civilization Essay581 Words   |  3 PagesWestern civilization is what we call modern society that mainly includes North America and Western Europe. But how did this western way of life come to be? Their are many different ways but mainly through ancient cultures. The two main ones are the Greek and Roman. Greece with their golden age and Rome with its great Empire and Republic and also together. Their are many ways in which western civilization is like the ancient Greek civilization. They started the Olympic games. Greeks comeRead MoreAncient Greek And Romes Impact On Western Literature1642 Words   |  7 Pages The impact greek and roman culture had on western civilization The ancient Greeks and Romans were two of the greatest civilizations of the ancient world. The two civilizations thrived in their ancient environments which eventually led to a large amount of wealth within these two cultures. It is because of this that these ancient cultures were able to make a variety of advancements in literature, architecture, art and many other fields. These two civilizations also produced some of the ancient world’sRead MoreGreek Mythology And The Mythology850 Words   |  4 Pagesexist depending on which part of the world an individual is in. The Greeks and Romans are both very polytheistic civilizations. They believe in a multitude of gods and creatures, and they have gods for fertility, elements, war, medicine, and a multitude of others. The mythology of these two cultures is exceedingly similar, although for those looking for a more interesting view on the subject, Greek mythology is far superior to Roman mythology. The time period in which mythological tales were told

Oppressive Qualities of Society Free Essays

The Oppressive Qualities of Society Society’s oppressive nature greatly affects the lives of the people within it, and the expectations society sets for its citizens drive people to strive for acceptance from their peers. In â€Å"A Respectable Woman,† Mrs. Baroda, a young wife, who tries diligently to welcome her husband’s friend Gouvernail into their society, becomes enthralled with him, facing temptation that would be viewed with trepidation. We will write a custom essay sample on Oppressive Qualities of Society or any similar topic only for you Order Now Similarly, in â€Å"A Shameful Affair,† Mildred, a repressed young woman, enticed by a farmhand, faces temptation and forced to fight her personal desires because of society’s restriction based on class hierarchy. In â€Å"The Kiss,† a woman sets aside her personal desire for the image she believes society desires the most in a marriage. In her short stories, Kate Chopin illustrates contrasting imagery and intense and tempting diction to convey that society dictates people’s decisions because people worry about their portrayal in society and are forced to concede their personal desires. Society’s expectations tend to reflect an ideal role, and because of this expectation society’s restrictions bind people because of their fear of an unjust portrayal in it. Society expects women to act as loving and caring mothers devoted to their children while their husband. For example, â€Å"A Respectable Woman,† when Mrs. Baroda welcomes her husband’s friend Gouvernail, she â€Å"imposed her society upon him . . . she persistently sought to penetrate the reserve in which he had unconsciously enveloped himself† (213). Chopin’s use of intense diction such as â€Å"imposed† which denotes a forcibly placed restriction, and â€Å"persistently† which denotes a tenacious behavior despite of initial opposition, suggests society’s strict expectation for woman to gracefully welcome others in their society by imposing those expected ideals on other people. Mrs. Borada’s diligence in welcoming Gouvernail becomes an infatuation when she becomes entranced by his stoic behavior towards her. The heavily stressed importance society places on material objects transferred to the expectations women believe they should strive to. For example, Nathalie coerces Brantain to become her fiance despite her desire for another, because he â€Å"was enormously rich; and she liked . . . the entourage which wealth could give her† (225). Chopin’s use of intense diction such as â€Å"enormous,† which has a denotation of grand, suggests the importance of material objects in society. She reveals how the desire for material objects taints the view of marriage, because of how the status that accompanies them is easily accepted in this materialistic society. These expectations that society sets forth tend to dictate the decisions of women. People’s choices depend on what is acceptable because individuals remain more concerned with the image they portray to society than their personal desires. For example, when Gouvernail goes outside to bring Mrs. Baroda a sweater, she feels drawn to him, but â€Å"the stronger the impulse grew to bring herself near him the further . . . did she draw away† (215). Chopin’s use of passionate diction such as â€Å"impulse,† which contains a denotation of a strong urge, conveys the inner conflict that arises when a woman’s personal desire clashes with what she believes is right according to society. In contrast, when Mildred is fishing with the farmhand, â€Å"his brown hand came down upon Mildred’s white one,† (165). Chopin illustrates the differences between Mildred and the farmhand, with Mildred’s â€Å"white one† conveying that she is pure and innocent, while the farmhand’s remains roughened and tanned by the labor he is forced to perform due to his role in society. Furthermore, Mildred’s withdrawal from something she clearly desires shows how she is forced to choose her image in society over he own desires. Women in society must ignore their impulses because harsh and unfair consequences await them if they do not conform. Lastly, despite the suppression of women’s desires, they are still forced to face consequences for their tempting thoughts. For example, after the farmhand kissed Mildred she realizes that â€Å"the secret must remain her own, a hateful burden to bear alone† (166). Chopin’s use of harsh diction such as â€Å"hateful† and â€Å"burden† conveys society’s negative view on personal desires such as Mildred’s attraction to the â€Å"Offender,† or the farmhand, while â€Å"alone† portrays a tone of alienation to suggest the idea that if she were to pursue her desires, then society would scorn her. Even when people try to ignore their desires in lieu of an image they fight to portray to society, they are still left to suffer. For instance, when Nathalie is married, she expects to receive the wealth and position in society because of her convenient marriage while also having what she truly desires out of society’s view, yet she learns that â€Å"a person can’t have everything in this world† (227). Chopin’s figure of speech, that people can’t have everything, conveys the idea that loss will exist no matter a person’s decision because they cannot have â€Å"everything,† and will be forced to choose between their desires and those of society. No matter how hard a person tries to escape the ridicule of society they still face the pain of loss and suffering because of suppressed desires. Fitting in is a controversial topic within society. No matter the change in era or the region people occupy, the desire to be deemed acceptable lives strong within everybody. In Chopin’s short stories she illustrates contrasting imagery and intense and tempting diction to suggest that society’s strict expectations influence the decisions of women because they are more worried about how they are portrayed to society then complying with their desires. How to cite Oppressive Qualities of Society, Papers

Civil Rights And Disobedience Essay Example For Students

Civil Rights And Disobedience Essay By acting civil but disobedient you are able to protest things you dont thinkare fair, non-violently. Henry David Thoreau is one of the most importantliterary figures of the nineteenth century. Thoreaus essay CivilDisobedience, which was written as a speech, has been used by many greatthinkers such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Ghandi as a map to fightagainst injustice. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a pastor that headed the CivilRights movement. He was a gifted speaker and a powerful writer whose philosophywas non-violent but direct action. Dr.Kings strategy was to have sit-ins,boycotts, and marches. Dr. Kings Letter from Birmingham Jail was basedon the principles of Thoreaus Civil Disobedience. Both Martin LutherKing Jr. and Henry David Thoreau are exceptional persuasive writers. Even thoughboth writers are writing on ways to be civil but disobedient, they have oppositeways of convicing you. Dr. King is religious, gentle and apologetic, focusing onwhats good for the group; while Thoreau is very aggressive and assertive for hisown personal hate against the government. Both Martin Luther King Jr. and HenryDavid Thoreau have the same ideas, but view them differently. Dr. King wants toultimately raise awareness and open doors for the better of a group. Thoreauwants more individual rights for people. Dr. King is explaining his view ofconscience: I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tellshim is unjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arousethe conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing thevery highest respect for the law (Martin Luther King, p. 521). This quote showsDr. Kings opinion on going to jail. King knows that he was unjustly put intojail. He accepts going to jail even though he was put in jail wrongly. Thecommunity then knows of the injustice and should pressure the government. Theother thing that happens is King is respecting the law by obeying it. He is apeaceful man and wants justice, but believes in following the rules peacefullyto get the job done. Thoreau feels that conscience plays a more personal role. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide rightand wrong, but conscience? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in theleast degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man aconscience, then. I think that we should be men first, and subject afterward(Henry David Thoreau, p.581). Thoreau is questioning why majorities make therules. He is questioning democracy. Hes telling us to question anything we doand why we should give into the government if we do not agree with a rule. Whyshould we be individuals with brains and have thoughts of our own if we are notallowed to think for ourselves and do what we want? If we believe we are free,why do we have so many rules? Thoreau believes we should be real to ourselvesand live for ourselves, not the government. King wants to change the lawsbecause they are morally wrong and Thoreau wants to change the law because hepersonally doesnt like it. Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King bothagree in justice exists. Thoreau thinks of injustice as friction or tension thatcan wear the machine down. King thinks that injustice just exists and tensionmust be created with direct action to negotiate with the machine. Thoreauexplians, If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine ofgovernment, let it go, let it go: perchance it will wear smooth,- certainly thatmachine will wear out, but if it is of such a nature that it requires you tobe the agent of injustice to another , then, I say, break the law. Let your lifebe a counter friction to stop the machine. (Henry David Thoreau, p.587). .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .postImageUrl , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:hover , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:visited , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:active { border:0!important; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:active , .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137 .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .udbed256e59a3b4c9ce8d821a40917137:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Personal Narrative - My Dad and the Sphinx! person EssayInjustice is a cause of friction, which is brought on by the government. Thegovernment has created something that is working against itself; if the frictionof the injustice is left alone it will continue to grind down the machine. Onceagain Thoreau questions if you can wait that long and what are you personallygoing to do about the injustice. Thoreau says use your life to stop the machine. Dr. King explains, injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. Weare caught in an inescapable network of mutuality tied in a single garment ofdestiny. Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly (King p.516). If we allow injustice to affect any one place the government knows they can getaway with it. If people dont fight injustice the government will continue toallow it because they know they can get away with it. We are all tied togetherin a mutual destiny; we are all in the same boat, what ever affects you affectsme. How can you sit and watch injustice happen, we are all connected; whatinjustice happens to me happens to you. Both Thoreau and King are trying toprove the point that we are our brothers keeper. We all need to fightinjustice to save each other. Thoreau and King have said what role conscienceplays for them and that injustice exists but you must use your conscience todecide what to do. Now they discuss just and unjust laws. Thoreau explains,unjust laws exist: Shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor toamend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress themat once. ( Henry David Thoreau, p.586) Thoreau is acknowledging that unjust lawsexist. I think he figured like the sun rises every morning there will be unjustlaws. How you deal with them if you do not approve of them is the question. Thoreau asks, will you be happy to just obey the law for as long as it takes tochange the law by the governments rules?Do you want immediate acton? If youfollow the governments rules it will take a very long time to appeal theunjust law in court and they still may not change the law. Can you wait thatlong?Or, should you take drastic direct action to be heard at once. Are youwilling to be arrested? Can you handle the responsibility for your actions, orare you scared. Thoreau is impleying that you should not wine about somethinginless you are ready and able to take the conciquinces. Dr. King explains how hejustifies breaking some laws and following others; the fact is there are simplytwo types of laws. Dr. King explains there are, just and unjust laws, One hasnot only a legal, but moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, onehas a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. A just law is a man-made codethat squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a cod e thatis out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of Saint ThomasAguinas, and unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and naturallaw. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades humanpersonality is unjust. ( Dr. King p.519-520). King is saying that just lawsshould be obeyed because they are the law and they are morally right. Morallyright is being or acting in accordance with established standards of goodbehavior. So, if a law is legal and good you should fallow it. People should notfollow unjust laws because they are wrong; you owe it to yourself morally. Ajust law is one that God would O.K; God is all loving, blind to any indifferenceand will forgive. The constitution says that all men are created equeal; sotherefore if the law is not the same to everyone, it is not a just law. Ifanyone is dehumanized it is an unjust law. Plain and simple, an unjust law makesyou feel bad about who or what you are . A just law should make y ou feel equaland proud to be a human being. While Thoreau focuses on what you might do abouta law, Dr. King focuses on what makes a law just or unjust. Thoreau knows thereare unjust laws; I believe he thinks as long as laws exist there will always bethe possibility of being unjust laws. Thoreau says yes, unjust laws exist butwhat are you going to do, just sit there or fight. Dr. King is trying to get into the heads of his fellow clergyman that unjust laws are morally wrong. Butthey both want to get the point across that you must do something to changeunjust laws because they are wrong and can take your God given freedom away. .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .postImageUrl , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:hover , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:visited , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:active { border:0!important; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:active , .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451 .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u98ed7f94a65810187a26420f60667451:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Sherlock Holmes the Best Detective Sample EssayEven though both writers are writing on ways to be civil but disobedient, theyhave opposite ways of convincing you. Their concepts are similar but theirapproaches are totally opposite. Dr. Kings religious and moderate tone aretotally different from Thoreaus intense hatred for authority, mostly thegovernment. They both want to point a finger at the government. Thoreau believesthe best government is one which governs the least. Dr. King believes theprinciples of government are necessary to keep order, but need to live up toAll men are created equal. The underlying meaning that I got from readingboth essays was that you should fo llow your heart and your conscience againstinjustice and unjust laws, no matter what approach you choose to take. BibliographyLetter from Birmingham Jail Martin Luther King CivilDisobedience by Thoreau